13 thoughts on “More

  1. Karim D. Ghantous says:

    Another set of winners. 😉

    On a technical note, while I really like #3 very much (which is what really matters), its tonality is a bit… flat. I have to guess it’s a digital file. Which is no bad thing – digital b&w doesn’t need a lot of work to look good. In this particular case, whatever the reason, it doesn’t have depth.

    • mewanchuk says:

      Hi Karim,

      I’m glad you liked the shot (I did too, which is why I posted it!) but am sorry you found it a bit “flat”. In truth, the lighting was *extremely* harsh (which is why I actually took the photo–I thought it highlighted The Producer nicely as the Angel which she is to us). In truth, I revisited the file many times before finally deciding to post it in its current form. Though not ideal or technically flawless, it is still an evocative image which stirs in me a feeling or emotion…and isn’t that what photography is all about?? As such, I really don’t find it “flat”.

      All the best,
      Mark

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s