As you are all probably now aware, there are talented people out there who could be perceived as “fussy” about their gear, and/or film scans…
They look down their “Bourgeois noses” at emulation software, Windows XP, and capable old scanners re-purposed from drug store kiosks.
The truth of the matter is, I wouldn’t be shooting film today (in any volume whatsoever) if not for the trusty ‘ole Pakon F-135.
While there certainly are occasions where B&W scans may display posterization artifacts in certain regions, on the whole, the scans are extremely impressive for their speed and ease of acquisition. This is even to say nothing of the fantastic colour profiling and correction which colour scanning affords.
Therefore, in an effort to prove how good (or lacking) the Pakon was, I put the following strips through the Pakon, and the “latest and greatest” Plustek Opticfilm 120. While the F-135 Plus *only* scans at 3000×2000 (~2100 dpi) I simply could not tell the difference for web-based sizes.
In actual fact, while the whole 24 Exposure roll took under three minutes to acquire on the Pakon, the negatives on the Opticfilm took a ton of effort (cutting, positioning, dusting, pre-scanning, selecting, scanning, saving, and adjusting). The Opticfilm files were scanned using VueScan Professional at 2600 DPI, with sharpening off. They were processed to taste in Lightroom 6.5 to create files with dynamic range similar to the auto-generated Pakon files.
In other words (no, I did not blow them up large…) I just don’t think I could make them look better! It simply wasn’t worth the extra time and effort I had to spend with the other scanner and software.
These are Ilford HP5+ pushed two stops to ISO 1600 on the Nikon F100, and developed in D-76. I have not labelled them at present…see which versions you prefer.
For the last two sets, I thought to myself “Self, there just HAS to be a difference…it is a newer, higher resolution scanner, and I am scanning at a higher DPI”. So for the third image, I turned off all image-related alterations in VueScan Pro, and rescanned. Finally, the fourth image is scanned at 5300 DPI (the supposed optical maximum of the Opticfilm 120) using SilverFast Professional instead.
So there you have it.
Draw your own conclusions–I’m not going to tell you how to live your life.
(…You won’t listen anyway).