The Problem of Scala.

I wanted to hate these files–I really did.

(…At least be underwhelmed by them, if possible).

Truth be told, they are a massive pain.

For starters, you really can’t push Scala–It is ISO 160, and that’s the way it is.

I suppose once could tweak the first development time, but given the cost, effort, and risk involved, I’m not sure I would want to–So ISO 160 is what it shall be.

Second, Scala is rare and expensive, and the chemicals hard to come by.  You can develop it in regular B&W chemistry (doing with it whatever you wish, I suppose…) but then it is just “regular ‘ole black-and-white film” and you lose the benefits of the additional silver density.

Third, development is a massive pain-in-the-rear.

The chemicals have to be mixed up immediately beforehand (five different compounds…) and do not keep.  One Foma R100 kit will do EIGHT rolls.  Period.  (And don’t even think about trying to do more than one roll at once).  Furthermore, development has to be done at precisely 20 degrees centigrade, and the times themselves are just. painful.

All told, the whole process takes upwards of 45 minutes, including washes.  Halfway through, you actually have to take the roll out, re-expose it to light in a predefined way, place it back in the tank, and continue the process.  Water spots are a big issue (it must have something to do with the way the film dries…) so extra care must be taken.  Finally, the chemicals have to be massively diluted for safe disposal.

Fourth; scanning is a big pain.  Don’t bother with a Pakon or a Noritsu–most don’t have a “B&W Transparency” option, and it is often difficult to deactivate the intrinsic digital ICE function which usually comes along with slide film scanning.  It is manual all the way here, and one should be prepared to fiddle with exposure, and multiple passes.

Finally, the main problem with Scala…

…is that afterwards, you are probably not going to want to shoot anything else.

Suddenly…there is just Agfa Scala, and pretty much every other B&W film.

So with one roll down, one eaten by the dog (please don’t ask) and six to go; Suddenly every 50-cent press of the shutter becomes something to think that much more about.

So it’s simple really:

Don’t shoot it.

🙂

(Or if you do, at least know that you really don’t have to do that much with it in post…)

Roll Twelve – 100RP

I hesitate to call it a roll, because it’s mostly dog…but I guess you take what you can get.

🙂

UltraMax 400 pushed to ISO 800.  This roll expired in 2016, and probably wanted to be shot at base ISO.  Quite a few left of this vintage…

A Different Sort of Portrait

I need to be honest with you:

 

I really want a Fuji GFX.

Like reeeeeeeeeeeeely.

With that 110/2 lens…Oy vey!

It is closer (price wise) to any possible version of reality than a recent Phase or Hasselblad digital MF camera or back.

There is only one problem:

It is not “really” Medium Format.

-and-

(okay, two problems…)

(2) Other than the stunning portraiture done by dudes like Jonas Rask (the guy is amazing…you should seriously check him out) anything I read online can’t seem to elicit a notable difference between the GFX50s, and the likes of a Sony A7Rii, Nikon D850, or possibly even D810.

Unless, of course, you print large.  (Like MASSIVE).

Which I don’t.

…Which brings me to the photo above.

It was taken with a Frankensteinian (is that even a word?) beast of a camera: A7Rii, with Nikon-mount “dumb” adapter, and Sigma 50 ART lens.  Manual focus, and nothing but a rough guess at aperture;

The image was then cropped, and further Frankensteinified.

And it sort of works.  (For me anyway…I mean, it’s not perfect)  Which kind of makes me think that I probably don’t neeeeeeeed a Fuji GFX.

 

But I still want one.

Badly.

 

 

(And don’t you come at me with your “X1D” nonsense…I am OUT!!)